Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Roberto Cid Subervi vs Ilia Simakin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Subervi vs Simakin analysis and find out who is favored!
Roberto Cid Subervi vs Ilia Simakin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Subervi 1 - 0 Simakin
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Subervi has won 50.07% of points on his second serve, while Simakin has won 53.79%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Subervi, in recent form, has won 56.44% of his opponent's second serve points, while Simakin has won 48.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36% and 33.19% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Subervi has saved 50.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Simakin has saved 64.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Subervi has won 65.63% of matches played (W/L 42/ 22), with Simakin winning 63.16% (W/L 36/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Subervi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 120/ 83), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Simakin has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Subervi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.47% of matches (W/L 35/ 12), where as Simakin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.81% of matches (W/L 35/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Subervi winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Subervi winning 2 and Simakin winning 1. The last match between Subervi and Simakin was at the M25 Kachreti, 15-05-2024, First, Hard with Roberto Cid Subervi getting the victory 7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:17:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Subervi and Simakin have played a deciding set 1 times, with Subervi winning 1 times and Simakin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Subervi winning 2, and Simakin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Subervi has played against opponents with an average rank of 202.95 while Simakin has played against players with an average rank of 96.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Subervi has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Simakin has won 35% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Subervi has converted 46.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Simakin has converted 37.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
428
Rank
211
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
546
Rank
539
High
20
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
57% (279-209)
Career Total W/L
60% (75-49)
65% (22-12)
YTD W/L
66% (19-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Roberto Cid Subervi | Ilia Simakin |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:17:0 | 3:17:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (71/109) | 50% (66/131) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (49/71) | 76% (50/66) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 66% (25/38) | 55% (36/65) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 11% (1/9) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (45/131) | 32% (35/109) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Ilia Simakin
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
50%
(
66 of
131)
2
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
35 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
45 of
131)
119
Total Points Won
121
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Roberto Cid Subervi | Ilia Simakin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (22/12) | 66% (19/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (46/32) | 64% (41/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (390/319) | 54% (351/304) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (10/4) | 57% (12/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (12/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 88% (7/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 42 | 173 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 75 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:8 | 1:40:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 269.82 | 149.07 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (1509/2204) | 60% (1153/1936) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1004/1509) | 73% (847/1153) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (348/695) | 54% (424/783) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (126/272) | 36% (69/191) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1004/2295) | 38% (754/1988) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (15/5) | 68% (19/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (22/34) | 64% (18/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 53% (9/17) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (8/10) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (20/19) | 90% (20/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (20/1) | 10% (20/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 11% (9/1) |
Roberto Cid Subervi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Christopher Bulus
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
4
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Ilia Simakin
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
50%
(
66 of
131)
2
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
35 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
45 of
131)
119
Total Points Won
121
|
7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guido Ivan Justo
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Hady Habib
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Roncadelli
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
91%
(
60 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
0%
(
0 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
14
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
97%
(
30 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ilia Simakin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ammar Elamin
Player
Ilia Simakin
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-2 15-13 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Ilia Simakin
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Ilia Simakin
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
50%
(
66 of
131)
2
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
35 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
45 of
131)
119
Total Points Won
121
|
7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Erik Arutiunian
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Marek Gengel
60%
(
74 of
124)
1st Serve %
72%
(
104 of
145)
18
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
77 of
104)
66%
(
33 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
0%
(
0 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
30 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
45 of
145)
139
Total Points Won
130
|
7-6(4) 6-7(6) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
49%
(
44 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
102)
13
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
0
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vadym Ursu
Player
Ilia Simakin
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Ilia Simakin
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Subervi Vs Simakin Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
